1.11.02 CFC Meetings notes
Attendance: (11) Maurice, Julian, Lynne, Kaye, Keith, Don, Chris,
Jesse, Olin, Saul, Ms Washington, Mike
Navy Proposed ESD for Parcel B
Comments to the Navy‚s document are due on Thursday, January
17
The document covers two Navy proposed clean-up actions on Parcel B
After receive comments the Navy can: (1) make changes to the
proposed plan and resubmit
(2) Decide not to make changes and go ahead with proposed plan
Parcel B shoreline
The current contract:
Navy build a temporary wall to block out water. After building the
wall the Navy is required to clean up the shoreline. Possible cost $5-10 million
Navy‚s proposed changes:
Capsulate Parcel B shoreline will concrete. Roughly a few hundred feet long and 10
feet deep would be covered in concrete. Cost less than 5 million dollars.
Unanswered questions/concerns:
· Navy ESD document needs
to provide more details on shoreline protection remedy
· What is being protected?
What is being encapsulated?
· No idea how deep
contamination goes down, Navy proposal would go only 10 feet.
· State regulators want
the Navy to clean shoreline and oppose encapsulating shoreline
· Federal regulators no
position yet, want more information
· City supports
encapsulation if the plan works, City wants to clean up Parcel B soon, so
transfer of Parcel B can occur
CFC
Next Steps
1.
Draft individual letters to Navy commenting on Navy proposed changes
2.
Contact R. Mach and inform him the ESD is not at the Bayview Library
3. The Letter is due Thursday (1.17.2)
should include comments and questions
4.
Letter should ask for extension because document was not made public,
ESD should be discussed at January RAB meeting, and an extension to allow RAB
TAPP grant contractor to review ESD, in order to better understand
contamination test beyond 10 feet.
Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)
Current contract: Navy is required to dig out soil around Building
#126, no cost estimated in ESD document
Navy proposed changes: use SVE to suck out contamination from
soil, no cost estimated in ESD document
Unanswered questions/concerns:
State and federal regulators go along with SVE
No long-term monitoring plan, will the Navy test for fugitive
emissions?
Need for better site characterization, the source of contamination
not well defined
Continue questions/concern:
How much contamination is in the soil? Not defined in Navy
document
What will be the hours of operation? Noise impacts?
What is the cost of current contract? Cost of proposed changes?
Navy Clean Up Updates
Legal team check-in meeting will be at the end of the month and
coordinated by ARC
Topics to be discussed will be the ESD, Navy Emergency Actions,
Prop 65 suit
Clean up will focus on landfill data gap projects first than
proposed project to expand cap
NEXT: Arc set-up meeting and circulating agenda
MOA- early Transfer of Shipyard to City
· The Navy and City have
been meeting to discuss early transfer
· Meetings schedule:
January 10, 17, 24 (in DC). The first meeting Navy proposed plan, second
meeting Navy will respond to City counter proposal
· Documents in
circulation: Navy proposal, City Amendments to Navy plan. Olin and Saul have reviewed and
Navy‚s proposal has no performance schedule and the City‚s plan
includes no language of development. Under the proposal parcel by parcel will
be transferred
NEXT
CFC gets copies of both Navy proposal and City counter proposal
Early transfer workshop on 1.18.01 at Advocates office from 1-5pm
Redevelopment Community Benefits Contract
CBE and its consultant team will be interviewed on Wednesday 16.
The contractor will work with Agency, CAC, and residents to develop a community
benefits package
Farallon Island Hearing- Department of Commerce is hosting
a hearing to know if people want waste removed and how manage sanctuary. Lynne,
Saul, Maurice plan on attending, Tuesday, January 15, 6:30pm
KPFA/KPOO Townhall meeting potential date: 2.23.02
PROPOSED
AGENDA FOR EARLY TRANSFER WORKSHOP
1-5pm, 5021 Third St.
MOA
developments
1pm-1:30
What
is Early Transfer?
1:30- 2:15
- Parameters?
Define? Examples? Models?
Discussion of a possible Community Assessment Plan 2:15-2:45
What CFC does not want
2:45-3:30
Process
of Developing Position
3:30-4pm
City
officials discussion
4pm-5pm